Nursing 6 Peer Responses
1st Post
I agree with the first post that in the healthcare sector, it is significant for nurses to gain stakeholders’ approval to feel valued and engaged in the policy and decision-making processes. The skin care rehabilitation market is sensitive and requires stakeholders’ engagement, including patients, their families, investors, and the executive bodies, in the planning and decision-making process to gain their approval, making them feel significant (Petkovic et al., 2020). Equitable human rights are also engaged in decision-making programs to enhance treatments based on a moral lens. Besides, involving stakeholders earns nurses’ stakeholder’s trust due to the transparency in the programs and guidelines. Therefore, holding frequent meetings is crucial to ensure stakeholder engagement and earning their loyalty.
Reference
Petkovic, J., Riddle, A., Akl, E. A., Khabsa, J., Lytvyn, L., Atwere, P., ... & Tugwell, P. (2020). Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation. Systematic reviews, 9(1), 1-11.
2nd Post
I agree with the second post that obtaining internal and external stakeholders’ approval is essential for successfully implementing projects. Stakeholders are grouped based on their interests and power in each project execution. Based on the level of power and interest, it is crucial to engage internal and external stakeholders as they directly impact the success or failure of projects (Dwivedi & Dwivedi, 2021). Participation of all stakeholders in the essential phases of projects based on individual power and interest is crucial to ensure transparency and acceptance of project deliverables. Hence, nurses should have an open communication channel with all stakeholders to pitch the legitimacy and transparency of their projects to earn their interest and support.
Reference
Dwivedi, R., & Dwivedi, P. (2021). Role of stakeholders in project success: Theoretical background and approach. International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management XI (1), 38-49.
3rd Post
I agree with the third post that having stakeholder support is crucial in implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) change programs in the healthcare sector. Before implementing EBP change projects, it is crucial to consider the perspectives of internal and external stakeholders. Without the engagement of stakeholders in projects, failure is inevitable as the project may face resistance (Quanbeck, 2019). Internal stakeholders such as employees and investors need to understand the suggested changes. If the change affects external stakeholders, including consumers, such as quality and cost concerns, the external stakeholders must also be engaged to ensure awareness and acceptance of the intended change.
Reference
Quanbeck, A. (2019). Using stakeholder values to promote implementation of an evidence-based mobile health intervention for addiction treatment in primary care settings. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(6), e13301.
4th Post
I agree with the post that equipping nurses and other care managers with improved technological tools significantly changes neonatal health results. According to Shields et al. (2020), in the United States, nearly 10-15% of infants require neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to save their lives. The NICU exists to reduce morbidity and death rates among infants. Maternal traits, such as mental health concerns or physical conditions, can influence neonatal concerns, notably at the gestational influencing the need for NICU. Since genetic assessment may be costly for families, clinicians can apply criteria such as assessment of the presence of withdrawal signs after delivery, pharmacotherapy, or antenatal opioid exposure to ensure the wellness of mothers and infants (Yen et al., 2023). Therefore, advancing technology in the NICU is necessary to improve infants’ survival rates.
References
Shields, L. B., Davydov, Y., Glyder, A., Weymouth, C., Udwin, M., & Eakins, M. (2023). Impact of Technology on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions and Length of Stay: A Retrospective Study. Cureus, 15(6).
Yen, E., Gaddis, N., Jantzie, L., & Davis, J. M. (2023). A review of the genomics of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Frontiers in Genetics, 14, 1140400.
5th Post
I agre
Our Advantages
Quality WorkUnlimited Revisions
Affordable Pricing
24/7 Support
Fast Delivery